SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Pat) 333

R.S.GARG, NAGENDRA RAI
Bihar State Electricity Board – Appellant
Versus
Umesh Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

1. The Bihar State Electricity Board and its Financial Controller (Pension) are the appellants before this Court and they are aggrieved by order dated 15.1.2002 passed in CWJC No. 6572 of 2000 by a learned Single Judge of this Court by which he has quashed the order dated 28.6.1999 issued by the appellant deducting Rs. 92,626.42 P., which was to be recovered from the writ petitioner-respondent as excess payment towards pay from the total sanction amount of gratuity payable to him.

2. The facts necessary for disposal of the present appeal are that the writ petitioner-respondent was appointed as Bill Clerk in the year 1964 and thereafter he was promoted to the post of Bill Collector in the year 1972. In 1976 he was promoted and confirmed on the post of Accounts Assistant. He was given selection grade with effect from 1.8.1988. He retired from the services of the Board on 31.9.1998.

3. The Board has come out with a Standing Order No. 385 dated 22.3.1973, according to which the Junior Accounts Clerk/ Bill Clerk/ Bill Collector shall be entitled to three advance increments after passing departmental examination. However Clause 3 of the said Standing Order provides that these adv









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top