S.N.Pathak, J.

1. This revision is directed against the judgment dated 4th February 2000 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, III, Samastipur in Cr. Appeal No. 91 of 1988, confirming the judgment of the trial court dated 20th April 1988 passed by the S.D.J.M., Samastipur in CR. Complaint Case No. 386 of 1976/Tr. No. 647 of 1988. The revisionists were convicted under Sections 420 and 467 of the Indian Penal Code and they were sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years.

2. It was alleged by the complainant Hari Charan Manjhi that accused revisionist Harish Chandra Jha obtained his L.T.I. on an unwritten stamped paper on the pretext that he will get his son released on bail in some criminal case. These papers were later converted into a sale-deed dated 6th June 1978 in respect of the land of the complainant having an area of 3 katha 16 dhurs. When the complainant learnt this fraud, he filed the complaint in the court in the year 1979, and the revisionists were put on trial and subsequently were convicted, as stated above.

3. I find that the trial court and the appellate court, both came to the conclusion, as aforesaid, on the basis of witnesses examined on behalf of the compl