SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Pat) 1020

NARAYAN ROY
Veena Kumari Jha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. Initially this application was filed for a direction to the respondents to make payment of arrears of salary to the petitioner since February 1998 and also the current salary. However, during the pendency of this writ application, the petitioner was terminated vide order, as contained in memo no. 3173 dated 1.12.2000, which was made available to the petitioner in January 2001, and, therefore, by amendment application the order of termination, as contained in annexure 18 has been challenged.

3. Short facts giving rise to this application are as follows: The petitioner after passing Matriculation examination joined the Primary Teachers Training College, Madhepura for two years training in 1975 and pursuant to the advertisement dated 21.10.1976, issued in Aaryavarta, inviting applications for preparation of panel for appointment as Assistant Teachers in Primary/Middle Schools in the District of Purnea the petitioner applied. The petitioner thereafter appeared before the interview board on 17.11.1976 and she was finally selected and a panel was prepared for appointment as an assistant teacher in the District of Purnea in accordance with the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top