SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Pat) 950

NAGENDRA RAI
Rajendra Prasad Athghara – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Chur Choudhary – Respondent


Judgment

1. After hearing learned counsel for the parties on the question of maintainability, i +find that this Civil Revision is maintainable and it is held so.

2. This Civil Revision is directed against the order dated 4.3.2002, by which the court below rejected the prayer of the defendant-petitioners to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the Code) on the ground that the proper court fee has not been paid on the plaint.

3. The facts leading to the filing of the present Civil Revision are that the plaintiff-opposite party filed a suit for following reliefs:

(a) That, the court be pleased to declare the alleged four sale deeds dated 15.11.1998 executed by defendant 2nd party in favour of the defendant 1st party to be illegal, void, inoperative and not binding on the plaintiff, the court be further pleased to declare the title of the plaintiff over the suit property.

(b) That, court be pleased to pass a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in possession of the plaintiff through the process of the court or any other way, the plaintiff against defendant.

(c) That, the cost of the suit be given to th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top