1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners seek to challenge correctness, validity and propriety of letter dated 8-1-2002 as contained in Annexure-2.

2. The brief facts leading to the present controversy in nutshell are that certain properties were purchased by the erstwhile owners under Annexure-D for raising and constructing a Dharamshala (INN). It appears that a private trust was created for managing the said property and with the passage of time the different members in the family started putting their claims over the management and the property. It also appears that the charitable cause of the public trust in fact became a cause between the different branches as each of them was interested in the earnings and the value of the property. One of the co-owners/trustees under his application dated 23-3-1998 submitted to the President, Religious trust board that under a particular document the property was purchased; a Dharamshala was constructed. It was used by the passengers and some of the trustees were mismanaging the property and in fact were misusing the earnings of the said property. He furthe