SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Pat) 1136

SHASHANK KR.SINGH, RAVI S.DHAVAN
Suo Motu Action Relating To class Of Persons Who Have not Received Their Salaries – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. The Court had appointed Amicus Curiae and Commissioners in this matter on the basis of which reports had appeared in the media. 15 government companies are mentioned as respondents. The media also reported that the workers of the government companies have died while awaiting their emoluments. If it were one company that itself was serious enough. But the fact that there are several companies and several employees it does make out a matter of concern. Dead people cannot support their briefs. Indigent persons cannot afford to come to the Court and engage professionals to argue their case without payment of pension. For them it is a matter of life and death and the Court cannot expect that they should engage professionals, thus, for such class of persons appointed an Amicus Curiae and Commissioners on 24 October, 2003.

2. Today learned counsel who had been appointed Commissioners have sought information on the following issues :

(a) In none of the company petitions details of man powers or staff strength has been given. This information be provided.

(b) In majority of the petitions the memoranda of association and article of association have been filed. This is statutory in














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top