1. The last submission of learned counsel for the petitioner was that an appropriate order be passed in this letters patent appeal. The court did ask the counsel whether he would like an order on a serious note or a lighter note? The hint apparently was not taken. Undaunted a bigamous husband has no regard for the law and would like to receive a prophylactic guard from the High Court to give him immunity for all times to come and make a laughing-stock out of the High Court.

2. The court wonders if this was the responsibility of the lawyers to advise on such causes between the temptation of bigamy and continuing amorous adventures. One man, two women and a macho misadventure should not have been advised to come to the High Court to take a seal of approval to licentious affairs with two women and claim a prize as a government job for yet more affairs.

3. Of the three persons, who had filed petitions seeking relief that they be granted appointment by the State of Bihar on the rule of harness or as compassionate appointment, two succeeded and one did not. The petitioner was the one who did not. The petition itself should have been filed separately. However, the story which the