SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Pat) 1193

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Arun Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. This application has been filed for quashing the notice dated 20-6-2003 issued by the Executive Officer of the Panchayat Samitee, Kutumba whereby a meeting of the Panchayat Samitee was convened on 26-6-2003 to consider the motion of no confidence against the petitioner.

2. Short facts giving rise to the present application are that the petitioner was elected as member of the Panchayat Samittee, Kutumba (hereinafter referred to as the Samitee) and subsequently elected as its Parmukh. Certain members of the Samitee wrote to the petitioner to convene a special meeting to consider the no confidence motion. A copy of the said requisition was also sent to the Block Development Officer, Kutumba who happens to be the Executive Officer of the Samitee. He in turn wrote to the petitioner to convene a special meeting to consider the no confidence motion. Ultimately the Executive Officer gave notice (Annexure-9) of the special meeting to be held on 26-6-2003 to consider the no confidence motion against the petitioner . Said notice was given on 20-6-2003. In this application prayer of the petitioner is to quash this notice.

3. It is relevant to state in the writ application petitioner












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top