SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Pat) 1207

PATNA HIGH COURT
Aftab Alam and C.M.Prasad JJ.
Bihari Mahto @ Kubra
Versus
State Of Bihar
Criminal Appeal No. 500 of 2000 ;
Decided On : NOVEMBER 24, 2003

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 302-Murder-Time of occurrence-Post mortem examination conducted after three hours of occurrence-Doctor mentioned that rigor mortis was absent in upper limbs and rigor mortis was present in the lower limbs-Appellants contention was that since the rigor mortis disappeared in the upper limbs which according to doctor disappears only after 12 hours of death- The death of deceased had taken place at least 12 hours before time of post mortem examination and not about three hours-Time for appearing and disappearing of rigor mortis cannot be accepted as conclusive material for deciding the time of death-As there are some exceptions also-Modis "Medical Jurisprudence also mentions about the cases in which rigor mortis developed and disappeared within an hour and half after death-It is also mentioned that when rigor mortis sets in early it passes quickly and vice versa-Thus the possibility of setting and passing of rigor mortis within a shorter period cannot be ruled out-It can not be considered to affect the prosecution case adversely-Evidence of witnesses examined with care and caution and there does not appear to be any infirmity in their evidence-No reason to interfere with the judgment passed by Trial Court. (Paras 14 & 16)

Judgment

C.M.Prasad, J.

1. The sole appellant Bihari Mahto @ Kubra stands convicted under Section 302, IPC, and sentenced to undergo R.I. for life and fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default of payment of fine, R.I. for six months. The appellant has also been convicted under Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3 years and fine of R. 1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, R.I. for 6 months. However, the sentences are to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution commenced with the fardbeyan (Ext-3) of the informant Surendra Prasad (PW 8), the Son of deceased Brahmdeo Prasad Yadav. The fardbeyan was recorded by S.I. Sandhyarani Mehta of Noorasarai Police Station on the 7th August, 1998 at 9.00 a.m. at the place where the dead body was lying. The informant stated in his fardbeyan that his father (the deceased) was cultivating a 3 Katha plot of land belonging to one Hira Sah of Murarpur, Biharsharif for the last 10 years on theka. In the relevant year, he had grown jhalra crop for use as fodder for the cattle. He further stated that, that day (7.8.1998) at 8.00 a.m he (the informant) along with his father (deceased) has gone to cut the jhalra crop and after cutting the crop, they were preparing the bundles of the same, at which time appellant Bihari Mahto @ Kubra came there and he asked them as to why they were not getting that land exchanged with his (appellants) land. At this, the deceased replied how he could get the land exchanged, when he was not the owner of the same. The informant says that on his fathers (deceaseds) such reply, the appellant threatened him (the deceased) and saying that he (the informant) would show the consequence immediately, he went to his cabin situated in front of the field and came back with a pistol and taking aim on the deceased, fired from his pistol hitting the deceased below his neck and above chest. At that time, the deceased was carrying bundle of jhalra crop on his head and receiving the fire-shot, he stumbled and fell down in the adjacent parti field of Ramanandan Gope (PW 5).

After shooting the deceased, the appellant fled away towards the village. The informant went to his father (the deceased) immediately and he saw that the deceased had received a fire shot injury below his neck and above chest and he had died. The informant also stated in his fardbeyan that his father had also received a long cut injury on his left palm and he guessed that the injury might have occurred in deceaseds attempt to ward off the fire shot hitting below neck and above chest or it might have also occurred from the sickle (hasua) which the deceased was carrying for cutting the jhalra crop. The informant named Krishna Gope (PW 2), Naresh Prasad (PW 3), Ramdeo Gope (PW 6) and some others as witnesses to the occurrence. On the basis of the fardbeyan, the formal FIR (Ext-4) was recorded at Noorsarai Police Station, being Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 161 of 1998 and, on completion of investigation, the appellant was tried and convicted by the impugned judgment dated 28th September, 2000 of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif passed in S.T. No. 663 of 1998/32 of 1999.

3. As many as eleven witnesses were examined by the prosecution in this case. PW 8 Surendra Prasad is the informant, PW I Chhotan Yadav, PW 2 Krishna Prasad, PW 3 Naresh Prasad, PW 5 Ram Nandan Prasad and PW 6 Ramdeo Gope are the eye-witnesses to the occurrence. PW 7 Kanti Devi is deceaseds wife who had come to the p.O. on learning about the murder of her husband (the deceased). PW 4 Bijendra Yadav is a witness on the point of preparation of inquest report of the dead body of the deceased. PW 10 Krishna Nandan Prasad is the seizure witness in whose presence the I.O. had seized blood soaked soil from the P.O.PW 9 Dr. Prabhat Kumar is the doctor who held the P.M. Examination on the dead body of the deceased. PW7 II Bhola Prasad Singh is the I.O. of the case.

4. For appreciating the ocular evidence, it is proper to discuss the doc
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top