SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Pat) 610

B.N.P.SINGH
Mohammad Arif – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

B.N.P.Singh, J.

1. The appellant suffered conviction under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code for which he was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and was also sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 2000/- on accusation that in the dead of night at 11.00 P.M. on 6th November, 1993 the appellant having gained his access in the inner appartment of house of Sanjeeda Khatoon (P.W. 3) having gagged committed sexual assault on her. The fardbeyan of the prosecutrix was recorded at 5.00 P.M. on 7th November, 1993, pursuant to which first information report was drawn up and investigation followed. As usual, in course of investigation, the Police Officer visited place of occurrence, recorded statement of witnesses, got the prosecutrix examined by the doctor and on conclusion of investigation laid chargesheet before the court.

2. In eventual trial that followed, the State examined altogether 8 witnesses and those examined by the State include one formal witness who brought on the record, first information report, the doctor, the prosecutrix, her family members and host of other witnesses.

3. The defence of the appellant both before the court below and this cour





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top