SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Pat) 646

M.L.VISA, NAGENDRA RAI
Deep Narayan Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Central Board Of Direct Taxes – Respondent


Judgment

1. Both the matters are connected ones and as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. By order dated January 30, 2003, the Central Board of Direct Taxes has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for condonation of the delay in filing the application u/s. 119(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for refund.

3. The matter relates to the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95. Admittedly, the petitioner had not filed the returns within the statutory period and filed the same on October 9, 1998. u/s. 237, read with sec. 239(2)(c) of the Act, the period for filing an application for refund is one year from the last day of such assessment year. Admittedly, the application for refund has not been filed within time. sec. 119(2)(b) of the Act empowers the Board to extend the period for filing an application for refund in case of genuine hardship. The Board has issued circulars from time to time laying down conditions for condoning the delay in filing the application for refund on the ground of genuine hardship.

4. The petitioner had come earlier before this court with a prayer that his applications for refu




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top