SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Pat) 844

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Suresh Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Chandramauli Kr.Prasad, J.

1. Various reliefs have been sought for in this writ application but when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. Shivendra Kishore confines the writ application to the relief of quashing the order dated 11,6.2001 (Annexure-7) whereby the petitioner has been informed that he is not eligible for pension under the State Bank of India Employees Pension Fund Rules. Further prayer made by the petitioner is to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to treat the period of suspension till reinstatement i.e. 19.2.1932 to first week of April, 1988 and 23.5.1989 to 10.5.1999 as pensionable service.

2. Short facts giving rise to the present application are that the petitioner at the relevant time was working in the Junior Management Grade Scale-I with the respondent-State Bank of India. A criminal case was instituted against him on 1.2.1982 and was put under suspension by order dated 19.2.1982. Later on, a departmental proceeding was initiated against him and memo of charges served by order dated 29.12.1982 and ultimately by order dated 30.7.1986 he was removed from service. The order of the disciplinary authority of removal dated 3


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top