SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Pat) 467

M.L.VISA
Madhuri Keshri – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

M.L.Visa, J.

1. This application by petitioner has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 by learned Sessions Judge, Saharsa in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 42 of 2002 (S) on 27.5.2002.

2. The case of petitioner, in short, is that she had filed a Complaint Case No. 218 of 2001 against opposite party Nos. 2 and 3, who are her in-laws, her husband Gopal Keshri and others, namely, Vijay Keshri, Madhuri Devi and Vinay Kumar Keshri Under Secs. 323, 387, 379, 498A, read with sec. 34, Indian Penal Code following her torture by aforesaid persons for the demand of a sum of Rs. 50,000.00 and a scooter as dowry from her father. The case of petitioner is that in her complaint petition, she gave the details of her torture including assault on her, stoppage of meal and finally snatching her articles including cloths, ornaments and pushing her out from their house. The further case of the petitioner is that opposite party Nos. 2 and 3, by order dated 27.5.2002 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Saharsa, have been granted anticipatory bail who, in spite of the fact that cognizance of the case after inquiry u/s. 202, Code of Criminal Proc





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top