SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Pat) 502

R.N.PRASAD, RAVI S.DHAVAN
Most. Anarsa Devi – Appellant
Versus
Most. Radha Devi – Respondent


Judgment

R.N.Prasad, J.

1. The Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 10-4-1991 passed in F.A. No. 300/81 whereby the judgment and decree dated 16-5.1981 passed in T.S. No. 66/46 of 1978/80 declaring the compromise judgment and decree passed on 12-1-1978 in T.S. No. 33/77 null and void, has been reversed.

2. During pendency of Letters Patent Appeal, Appellant No. 1, namely, Ram Udgar Mahto and Respondent No. 1, namely, Ram Prasad, Rai died., Their heirs were substituted. However, Ram Udgar Mahto and Ram Prasad Rai hereinafter shall be referred to as Appellant No. 1 and Respondent No. 1 respectively for the sake of brevity and clarity.

3. Ram Prasad Rai (deceased) Respondent No. 1, filed T.S. No. 33/77 against the appellants for specific performance of contract stating therein that the Appellant No. 1, Ram Udgar Mahto (deceased) who was in need of money for paying sudbharana money approached him for sale of 2 bighas 12 kathas 12 1/2 dhoors of land described in schedule A of the plaint for a consideration of Rs. 10200.00 he agreed to purchase the land and accordingly Ram Udgar Mahto, the Appellant No. 1 executed a deed of agreement on 5-9-1974. AT t



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top