SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Pat) 221

R.S.GARG, NAGENDRA RAI
Sanjay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioner has challenged three different orders with regard to three different circles. In our view, the petitioner is liable to pay three sets of court fee. Two sets of court fee should be paid by tomorrow failing which the writ application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench.

2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture and wholesale supply of country liquor. He is aggrieved by the order dated September 28, 2002 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Biharsharif, contained in annexure 1 to the writ application, order dated November 22, 2002 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Darbhanga contained in annexure 8 to the writ application and the order dated November 28, 2002 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Samastipur contained in annexure 10 to the writ application wherein the authorities have directed him to make payment of the amount of the sales tax mentioned in the orders on the ground that he has wrongly claimed discount above 20 per cent and has included discount above the same in the gross turnover.

3. The aforesaid orders/directions have been issued by the authorit


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top