SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Pat) 208

R.S.GARG
Mahanth Vijay Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

R.S.Garg, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 18-9-2002 passed by the Chairman/President of the Religious Trust Board removing the petitioner from the office of the trustee and directing constitution of a Trust Committee, has come to this court, inter alia submitting that the order as contained in Annexure-12 is not only contrary to the provisions of law but is also contrary to the earlier direction issued by this Court. It is noteworthy that on ancarlier occasion the petitioner came to this Court in CWJC No. 8305 of 1998. The petitioner had challenged his removal from the office of the trustee. The order was passed by the Chairman Bihar State Board of Religious Trust in exercise of his power u/s. 28(2) h (III) of the said Act. This Court observed that the petitioners removal was illegal because the order was passed before the petitioners show cause reached the authority. This Court also observed that the order was passed without taking into consideration the show-cause, therefore, the petition deserved to be allowed. The Court accordingly allowed the writ application by its order dated 2-12-1999 and directed the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top