NARAYAN ROY
Lovely Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University – Respondent
1. Heard counsel for the parties.
2. This writ application has been filed for issuance of a direction upon the Respondents-University to publish the result of B.Sc. Mathematics (Hons).
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner appeared in B.Sc. (Hons) examination held in 2000 to clear B.Sc. Part-Ill course and she also appeared for one paper of Part-II and she has passed the examination but the University authorities are not publishing her result, saying that the petitioner could not have appeared in one examination to clear two courses as per rule 7.1 of the Regulation of the University.
4. Learned counsel for the University submits that the result of the petitioner has not been published as she has appeared in one examination to clear part-III course examination and also one paper of Part-II.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner now submits that this question was gone into by this Court in the case of Akhtar Alam vs. B.N.Mandal University and ors. 2003 (1) PLJR page 28 and this Court considering the facts and circumstances of the case held that on principle of equity the result of the petitioner is required to be published even though t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.