SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 177

S.K.KATRIAR
Ram Vinod Roy & Another – Appellant
Versus
Mostt. Ram Sumari Devi – Respondent


Judgment

S.K.Katriar, J.

1. The defendant is the appellant against an order of remand. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 29.9.2000, passed by the learned IVth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Samastipur, in Title Appeal No. 38 of 1989 (Most. Ram Sumari Devi and others vs. Ram Binod Rai and others), whereby he has set aside the judgment and decree dated 30.6.1989, passed in Title Suit No. 35 of 1979 (Bal Govind Raout vs. Ram Binod Rai and another), impugned before him, and has remitted back the matter to the learned trial court for a fresh judgment in accordance with the observations made therein and in accordance with law.

2. The suit was instituted for removal of encroachment allegedly by the defendant (appellant) to the extent of four dhurs. In other words, it is a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession of 4 dhurs of land. The defendants entered appearance and contested the matter leading to the aforesaid judgment, whereby the trial court dismissed the suit. The plaintiffs appealed which has been allowed by the impugned judgment, that of the trial court has been set aside, and the suit has been remitted for a fresh judgment, in accordance
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top