SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 1003

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Uday Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank Through Its General Manager – Respondent


Judgment

Chandramauli Kr.Prasad, J.

1. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 14.12.1996 whereby the service of the petitioner, while on probation has been terminated by paying him one months salary in lieu of notice. Further prayer made by the petitioner is to quash the order dated 31.3,1997 (Annexure-2) whereby the petitioners prayer to revoke the order of termination had been rejected.

2. Short facts giving rise to the present application are that by order dated 21.3.1996 (Annexure-5) petitioner was appointed as a Peon on probation for a period of six months. The order of appointment indicated that his service can be terminated during the period of probation by giving him one months notice in writing or salary in lieu thereof. In pursuance of the aforesaid order of appointment petitioner joined his duty at Saraiya Branch of the Respondent Canara Bank on 30th of March, 1996 on probation for a period of six months and during that period, his probation was extended to afford him an opportunity to improve the performance by another three months i.e. 29.12.1996. During the period of probation petitioner absented himself unauthorisedly for a period of 151 days. Th

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top