SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 1040

M.L.VISA
Basant Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Warsha Khatoon – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioner has filed this application for taking appropriate action against opposite parties for violating and disobeying the order dated 13.5.1999 of this Court passed in M.A. No. 401 of 1998 by which opposite parties were directed to maintain status quo.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner filed a suit against opposite parties for specific performance of contract in respect of sale of a land fully described in Schedule-IV of the plaint of the suit. In that suit, the petitioner filed a petition dated 12.9.1997 under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 and Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code (in short "CPC") with a prayer to restrain opposite parties from alienating or transferring the suit properties. This petition was rejected and against which petitioner filed M.A. No. 401 of 1998 in this Court. The petitioner filed I.A. No. 10319 of 1998 for grant of injunction against opposite parties directing them not to sell or alienate the physical feature of suit properties. The aforesaid miscellaneous appeal was listed for hearing under Order 41, Rule 11 of CPC alongwith I.A.No. 10319 of 1998 and on 13.5.1999 after hearing the counsel of petitioner, the miscellaneous appeal






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top