SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 1035

AFTAB ALAM
Yogendra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

1. This writ petition seeks to challenge the seizure of Polythene carry-bags by the respondent Customs officials under seizure-memo, dated 11.9.2003 (Annexure-9). From the seizure memo it appears that the seizure was made on 11.9.2003 at 5.45 hours at Sarotar on Dharaghora-Khajuria road. The Polythene carry-bags were in two bundles (9 bags in one and 5 bags in the other) with the total Nt. Wt being 290 Kgs and their value, according to the seizure memo, was Rs. 12, 700/-. In the memo the reason for the seizure was stated as follows:

"Violation of GIMF Notification No. 9.Cus/96 dated 22.1.1996 issued under section 11 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with section 3 of the FT (D&R) Act, 1992".

2. The petitioner claims ownership of the seized goods and makes the plea that the seizure was illegal and without jurisdiction and consequently, any resultant confiscation proceeding would also be equally without jurisdiction.

3. The petitioner works a small scale industrial unit under the name and style of M/s Sharda Plastic Industries at Raxaul in the district of Champaran. The unit is engaged in manufacture of Polythene bags and other plastic goods that are excisable commodities. The un














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top