SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 287

NAGENDRA RAI
Gorakh Giri – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Giri And Others – Respondent


Judgment

Nagendra Rai, J.

1. The plaintiff-petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 22.1.2003, passed by the Additional District Judge-III, Siwan, in Title Appeal No. 103 of 1983, rejecting the application filed by the petitioner under Secs. 151, 152 and 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code). The prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is to incorporate reliefs, prayed for in the suit, in the judgment and decree, which have been omitted by the appellate Court while allowing the appeal after setting aside the dismissal of the suit by the trial Court.

2. The factual matrix necessary for disposal of the present matter are that the petitioner filed Title Suit No. 81 of 1972 in the Court of the 2nd Munsif, Siwan, against the defendant-opposite parties under Order I, Rule 8 of the Code for declaration that the disputed land is a public land and the defendants have no right and title over the same and they have no right and title to construct wall, Palani etc. over the suit land and also for delivery of possession after removal of the illegal structure of the defendant-opposite parties from the suit land.

3. The trial Court dismissed the suit. The plain













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top