SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 742

R.S.GARG
Nishikant Arya – Appellant
Versus
Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board – Respondent


Judgment

1. On 16.7.2004 after going through the documents which are at page 12 to 15 of this writ application the Court noticed that as many as four affidavits sworn by Ajanta Arya, Nishikant Arya, Shashikant Arya and Ravikant Arya were attested by the Notary Public Mr. Devanand Prasad though the said affidavits were not even signed by the deponents. Being shocked by the fact that unsigned affidavits were attested by the Notary Public this Court issued notice to Mr. Devanand Prasad to show cause as to why for the misconduct on his part action be not proposed against him and the State Government be not required to consider cancellation of his license. Mr. Devanand Prasad is present in person. His counsel is also present, he has filed his show cause. The fact that the unsigned affidavits were attested by him is not disputed. The explanation coming forth from his side is that when the affidavits were placed before him for attestation he required the counsel to get the signatures of the deponents, thereafter when he again returned back to his seat after finishing some of the Court work he found a bunch of documents lying on his table, which also contained the said affidavits, which wer



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top