SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 256

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Brij Nandan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Chandramauli Kr.Prasad, J.

1. This application has been filed for quashing the communication dated 7.11.2002 (Annexure-8) of the Secretary, Rural Development Department addressed to the District Magistrate, Jehanabad in which it has been observed that the no-confidence motion passed against respondent no.5 is illegal and she will continue as Pramukh of Panchayat Samiti, Jehanabad.

2. The facts necessary for the decision of the present writ application are that the petitioner is an elected member of Jehanabad Panchayat Samiti whereas respondent no.5 Rekha Devi happens to be its Pramukh and a special meeting to consider the no-confidence motion against respondent no.5 was held on 28.9.2002 in which out of the total number of the elected members of the Panchayat Samiti i.e. 20, 19 members including respondent no. 5 were present. According to the petitioner himself out of 19 members present in the meeting 14 took part in the voting and 5 abstained from the voting and out of 14 members who voted in the special meeting, 7 voted in favour of the no-confidence motion and 7 against the motion. According to the petitioner, in case of equality of votes, the Up-Pramukh who was presidin




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top