SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 410

NAGENDRA RAI, P.N.YADAV
Sajjan Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Nagendra Rai, J.

1. The petitioners have filed C.W.J.C. No. 9942/1992 for quashing the order dated 9.9.1992 passed by the Child Development Project Officer, Punpun, cancelling the engagements of the petitioners and restoring the engagements of Renu Kumari and others (writ petitioners of C.W.J.C. No. 290 of 1991) in pursuance of an order passed by the higher authorities in terms of the order dated 27.4.1992 passed by this Court in the said writ application, whereby the cancellation of the selection of the writ petitioners of the aforesaid writ application was quashed.

2. Civil Review No. 23 of 1992 has been filed by the petitioners to review the order dated 27.4.1992, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 290 of 1991, by which, as stated above, cancellation of selection as Anganwari Sewika of Renu Kumari and others (petitioners of C.W.J.C. No. 290 of 1991) was quashed by this Court, the effect of which is that the subsequent engagements of the writ petitioners in their places stood cancelled by order dated 9.9.1992, as stated above.

3. The petitioners of C.W.J.C. No. 9942 of 1992 and Civil Review No.23 of 1993 will be referred to as the writ petitioners and the petitioners of C.W.J.C. No.

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top