SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 518

R.S.GARG
Arun Kumar Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

R.S.Garg, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner joined the services as Drug Inspector in the year 1973. In accordance with the rules of 1974 he was required to pass the Hindi Noting and Accounts examination within five years of coming into force of the rules, i.e., before 1979. According to the petitioner, despite his best efforts he could not clear the examination, but the increments were given to him regularly since after his joining the services and despite the fact that he did not pass the examination. The petitioner was issued a notice on 7.3.2003 to show cause as to why the increments be not stopped and the amount received under the increments be not recovered from him. The petitioner has now come to this Court, Inter alia, submitting that he made his best efforts to pass the examination but unfortunately could not. It is also submitted by him that after amendment of the rules he made an application to the State Government seeking exemption from passing the departmental examination and as the application for exemption was pending consideration, no orders could be passed against the interest of the petitioner.

3. The respondents in their counte







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top