V.N.SINHA
Deo Kumar Sah – Appellant
Versus
Mahesh Pd. Rai – Respondent
1. Heard Sri Mahesh Narain Prabat onbehalf of the petitioner. No one appeared on behalf of the opposite party in spite of receipt of notice by them.
2. This civil revision application is directed against the order dt. 23.2.01 passed by the Subordinate Judge II, Chapra in Execution case no. 3/98 by which he has refused the prayer to amend the description and area of the land indicated in Schedule III of the plaint. Learned counsel appearing in support of this application has submitted that before filing of this suit another suit bearing Title Suit no. 100/75 was contested between Mostt. inri and Deo Kr. Sah, the plaintiff-petitioner. During the pendency of that suit a gift deed was executed by Mostt. inri in favour of opposite party nos. 5 and 6 herein. Later ignoring the contents of the said deed of gift, compromise was arrived at between the parties i.e. Most inri and Deo Kr. Sah in the earlier suit and the suit was decreed in terms of compromise under judgment and decree date. 6.8.1976. In terms of the compromise decree Schedule I and Schedule II lands came to the share of Mostt. Inri and Deo Kr. Sah respectively. Later opposite party nos. 5 and 6 sold a portion of land w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.