SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 120

NAGENDRA RAI
Ram Udar Rai – Appellant
Versus
Ram Chandra Rai – Respondent


Judgment

1. This revision application is directed against the order dated 11.12.2002 passed by the court below in Misc. Case No. 9 of 2000 allowing the application filed by the opposite party under section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act, directing the petitioner to execute the registered sale deed in favour of the opposite party Ram Chandra Rai within the period specified therein on payment of consideration amount and the interest at the rate of 15% per annum with cost failing which the opposite party would be entitled to get the land executed through the processes of the court.

2. Admitted fact is that one Brahmdeo Rai had two sons, namely, Talebar Rai and Ram Udar Rai, Surauni Devi was the wife of aforesaid Brahmdeo Rai, Talebar Rai had two sons, namely, Ram Shrestha Rai and Ram Chandra Rai (applicant-opposite party) and two daughters, namely, Ram Kali Devi and Binda Devi. The petitioner Ram Udar Rai filed partition suit being Partition Suit No. 8 of 1968 in the court of Subordinate Judge, Muzaffarpur against his father Brahmdeo Rai, nephew Ram Shrestha Rai and Surauni Devi. The said suit was disposed of on compromise on 26.8.1988. Plot nos.3793














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top