SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 508

RADHA MOHAN PRASAD
Manoj Kumar Mannu – Appellant
Versus
Life Insurance Corpor-ation Of India – Respondent


Judgment

1. In this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 20.2.2003 and 25.2.2003, contained in Annexure 4 series, whereby and whereunder his renewal commission has been forfeited.

2. In short, the relevant facts are that the petitioner was initially appointed as an agent on probation with effect from 7.11.1988 by the Branch Manager, Muzaffarpur Branch Office-1 vide letter, contained in Annexure 1, for the period 7.11.1988 to 6.11.1992. He was given Agency Code No. 04042531. Later, vide letter dated 5.12.1989 his appointment as an Insurance Agent was confirmed as per regulation 7(2) of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Agents) Regulations, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations). It is claimed that the petitioner continuously worked as an agent for more than 13 years and finally on 15.12.2001 he submitted his resignation to the competent authority, on receipt of which the petitioner, vide letter dated 28.1.2002 (Annexure 3), was communicated that his said resignation is under consideration before the competent authority and that, in the meanwhile, the competent authority has directed to stop his commission bill till further instructions.

3.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top