SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 311

AFTAB ALAM, B.K.JHA
Daya Shankar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal and the connected appeal being Criminal Appeal No. 94 of 1998 are filed against the same judgment and order passed by the trial Court and, therefore, these two appeals are to be heard together.

2. Appellant No. 2, Maya Shankar Singh in this appeal stands convicted under S. 302 of the Penal Code. The rest of the three appellants, Daya Shankar Singh in this appeal and two other appellants in the connected appeal were convicted under Ss. 302/34 of the Penal Code. Both Maya Shankar Singh and Daya Shankar Singh were further convicted under S. 27 of the Arms Act. All the appellants are sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life for committing murder and the two appellants in this appeal are further sentenced to three years R.I. for the offence under the Arms Act.

3. The two appellants in the connected appeal being Cr. Appeal No. 94 of 1998 were granted bail by this Court. In this appeal, however, the prayer for bail on behalf of both the appellants was rejected, in the case of Maya Shankar Singh, his prayers for bail were rejected more than once.

4. When the appeals were called out for hearing Mr. Akhileshwar Pd. Singh, counsel appearing for the informant filed an






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top