SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 581

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Birendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Election Commission – Respondent


Judgment

Chandramauli Kumar Prasad, J.

1. Petitioner as also respondent No. 4 contested for election to the office of the Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat, Katchore for which the election was held on 19.4.2001. In the said election, petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the returned candidate) was elected Mukhiya and respondent No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the election petitioner) lost. Election petitioner filed application challenging the election of the returned candidate, which was registered as Election Petition No. 28 of 2001. The election petition presented by the election petitioner was barred by limitation but the learned Munsif by order dated 11.7.2001 condoned the delay in its filing, on an application filed by the election petitioner u/s. 5 of the Limitation Act and thereafter transferred the case to the Court of 2nd Additional Munsif for trial. During the trial of the election petition one of the issues framed was as follows :

"Is the Court competent to condone the delay in filing this election petition u/s. 5 of the Limitation Act?

2. The aforesaid issue was taken up for consideration by the learned Munsif as a preliminary issue and by order dated 6.3.2002 answered the s

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top