SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 658

PATNA HIGH COURT
Nagendra Rai and Navin Sinha JJ.
Braj Kishore Singh
Versus
State Of Bihar
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1457 of 2001 ;
Decided On : JULY 8, 2004

Headnote:Bihar State Universities Act, 1976-Section 35-Staffing Pattern-Once the staffing pattern recommended by Bihar Inter University Board has been approved by the State Government the same will amount to creation of posts-If the appointments are made against the posts as per staffing pattern within the sanctioned strength, they can not be said to be violative of section 35 of the Act on the ground that posts have not been sanctioned by State Government provided the candidates possessed requisite qualification and selection was not in breach of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. (Para 6)

       Service Law-Salary-Fixation of-Appointment of appellants on sanctioned posts after due process of selection, duly approved by the University-State Govt. refusing to approve the appointments-Full Bench of the Patna High Court accepted the appointment from the initial date and passed the order for regularisation-Appellants are entitled to payment of arrears of their salary for the period prior to regularisation. (Paras 12 to 14)

       1997 (1) PLJR 509 FB-Referred to.

       AIR 1990 SC 1607-Relied upon.

       

Judgment

Nagendra Rai, J.

1. The appellants numbering 20 are aggrieved by order dated 6th November, 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in CWJC No. 3851 of 1999 by which their prayer to quash the order dated 19.7.1998 (Annexure-5 to the writ application) issued under the signature of the Additional Secretary, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, directing that the appellants shall be entitled to salary only from the date of their regularisation of services as well as the letter dated 23.7.1998 issued by the Registrar of the respondent-Jai Prakash University to the Jagdam College, Chapra, directing for refund of the salary which were paid to the appellants for certain period prior to 20th May, 1998 and further prayer to direct the respondents to fix the salary of the appellants in their respective scale from the date of their initial appointment and to pay the arrears of salary has been rejected.

2. The only question for determination in this case is as to whether the appellants are entitled to payments of arrears of salary as well as fixation of salary from the date of initial appointment on Class III and Class IV posts in Jagdam College, Chapra or not.

3. According to the respondent- State, the appellants are entitled to salary and other benefits from the date of order of regularisation passed by the State Government in pursuance of a direction of a Full Bench of this Court in the case of the appellant disposed of on 19th February, 1997, reported in 1997 (1) PLJR 509.

4. The necessary facts to decide the said question are as follows; Jagdam College, Chapra (for short, the College) was affiliated to the Bihar University, now named as Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University. On 7th February, 1976, it became a constituent unit of the said University with effect from 1st April, 1975. Later.on Jai Prakash University was carved out of the aforesaid University and the college is now a constituent unit of the said University. 20 sanctioned posts of Class III and 43 sanctioned posts of Class IV were in existence prior to 17th January, 1973. 9 Class III posts and 13 Class IV posts were created on January, 17, 1973. On November, 29, 1977, the Bihar University, as it then was, constituted a Selection Committee comprising of the Principal and three senior most Professors for appointment against vacant Class III and IV posts. After due advertisement, the appointments of the appellants and others were made in March, 1979 and since then the appellants are working on Class III and Class IV posts. At the time of appointment in 1979, 9 Class III and 13 Class IV posts were vacant against which all the 20 appellants were appointed on the said posts. The University approved the appointments on March, 2, 1981 and for-warded the same to the State Government for its approval. The appellants were being paid their salaries. However, the State Government on 8th June, 1983 refused to approve the appointments of the appellants on the ground that the appointments were made beyond the staffing pattern as fixed by the State Government in terms of the statutory provision. The appellants represented the matter before the State Government but of no avail. Thereafter, the appellant filed CWJC No. 497 of 1984 challenging the order dated 8th June, 1983 by which the State Government has refused to approve their appointments and the said writ application was dismissed on 6.4.1984. The appellants preferred LPA No. 36 of 1994. The Division Bench hearing the Letters Patent Appeal having noticed conflicting decisions referred the matter to the Full Bench. The matter was heard by the Full Bench and the Full Bench allowed the appeal by order dated 19.2.1997. It quashed the order of the State Government dated 8th June, 1983 and held that the appellants are entitled to have their services regularised against the posts within the staffing pattern as applicable to the College.

5. Before the Full Bench, the stand of the State Government was that neither the posts wer

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top