SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Pat) 640

J.N.BHATT, NAGENDRA RAI
Karu Manjhi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. In this petition a short question which has emerged for consideration under limited jurisdiction is as to whether the petitioner an accused in a murder case in Pakri Barawan P.S. Case No. 64 of 2004 wherein the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah has passed an order dated 6.9.2001 rejecting an application of the petitioner submitted for bail by invocation of the provision of sub-section (2) of Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Cr PC), contending that the petitioner has acquired an indefeasible right and the view taken by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and affirmed in Revision by the learned Sessions Judge, is totally illegal requiring interference of this Court so as to quash and set aside the same.

2. Mr. A.N. Singh, learned standing counsel has appeared on behalf of the State. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. We have examined the factual profile emerging from the record of this case.

3. A bail application with the aid of the provision of sub-section (2) of Section 167 of the Cr PC came to be filed by the petitioner before the trial Magistrate, inter alia, contending that the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top