SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Pat) 64

MRIDULA MISHRA
Bharat Baitha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for respondent no. 5

2. The land in dispute relates to revisional Plot No. 206 area 18 decimals and Revisional Survey Plot no. 201 Area 4 decimals situated at village Rajkhand P.S. Goroul District Vaishali. The case of the petitioner is that he is maternal great grand son of one Munar Baitha son of Bhaju Baitha. Bhaju Baitha has one daughter Etwaria and one son Monar Baitha. Monar Baitha died issueless leaving behind his only sister Etwaria. Petitioner is the maternal grand son of Monar. Monar Baitha was alive at the time of revisional survey operation which took place in the year 1970 and his name was entered in the revisional survey khatian as a tenant. After his death petitioner came in possession of the land. During consolidation proceeding he filed a petition under Section 12 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Fragmentation Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in respect of his right, title and interest over the land which was decided in his favour on 26.3.1986 and his name was recorded in the register of the land as well as in chak register. He remained in peaceful cultivating poss









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top