SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Pat) 427

RAJENDRA PRASAD, REKHA KUMARI
Arbind Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Bihar State Electricity Board – Respondent


Judgment

1. Having heard learned counsel Mr. Manu Shankar Mishra appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel Mr. Mihir Kumar Jha appearing for the respondents on the point of limitation and finding sufficient cause for not preferring this review petition within the period of limitation prescribed by law we condone the delay in filing the review petition and proceed to hear learned counsel Mr. Manu Shankar Mishra appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel Mr. Mihir Kumar Jha appearing for the respondents on the point of admission.

2. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bearing CWJC No. 11604/93 in this Court for quashing the order dated 25.9.1993, contained in Annexure 14/1, issued under the signature of the Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna cancelling the appointment of the petitioner as unskilled khalasi as well as the consequential order dated 1. Having heard learned counsel Mr. Manu Shankar Mishra appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel Mr. Mihir Kumar Jha appearing for the respondents on the point of limitation and finding sufficient cause for not preferring this review petition within the
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top