SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Pat) 1023

MRIDULA MISHRA
Ram Yatan Singh @ Ram Jatin Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State.

2. Relief sought for in the present writ application is for making payment of retiral dues and other lawful claims of the petitioner, such as CPF and gratuity with statutory interest.

3. Petitioners case is that he was appointed on the vacant post of Sales Man in regular pay scale in Khadi Bhawan, Patna, which is one of the units of Bihar State Khadi and Village Industries Board, (hereinafter referred to as the Board). He joined on 18.2.1963 and after serving near about 33 years retired from service on 31.1.1999. During his service period, on the order of the Administrative Officer, Khadi Bhawan, Gaya, petitioner was asked to act as an Accountant and while continuing on the post of Accountant a police case bearing Muffasil Gaya PS case No. 302 of 1998 was lodged by Mahesh Prasad, the then District Khadi Gramodyog Officer, Gaya. Case was instituted against Suresh Prasad Singh, Manager and the petitioner for the offence under Secs. 409 and 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 . After investigation police submitted chargesheet under Secs. 409/120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 , 30.12.1999 against Sur




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top