SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Pat) 1055

M.L.VISA
Pintu Singh @ Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard.

2. Petitioner has filed this application for quashing order dated 8.12.2004 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in Kharagpur Police Station Case No. 55 of 2004 allowing the petition dated 23.11.2004 filed by informant for recording statements of some witnesses under Section 164 of Criminal Procedure Code (In short "Cr. PC").

3. Learned counsel of petitioner submits that in Kharagpur Police Station Case No. 55 of 2004, police, after investigation, submitted charge-sheet under Sections 144, 341, 323 and 504 of IPC and informant on 23.11.2004 fiied a petition for examination under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. of some witnesses named in the petition on the ground that those witnesses were not examined by Investigating Officer and, thereafter, on 8.12.2004, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger took cognizance of the case and also allowed the aforesaid petition of informant. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that the question of examination of some witnesses under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. was not raised by prosecution, therefore, the impugned order is not proper and it must be quashed. From the perusal of impugned order, I find that the Court below after





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top