SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Pat) 774

MRIDULA MISHRA
Mol Chandra Jha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner has superannuated from the service on 31.8.2004. He has prayed for quashing the order, dated 1.11.2002, contained in letter no. 2200, issued by the Deputy Secretary, District of Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Government of Bihar (Annexure 3), reverting the petitioner from the post of Machhua to the post of Orderly and also the consequential order, dated 7.10.2004, contained in memo no. 329, issued by the Director, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Department, Government of Bihar (Annexure 4). By this order a direction has been issued to recover the amount paid to the petitioner as salary on account of his promotion. The other prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to fix his pension on the basis of last pay drawn and also direct the respondents to make no recovery from his pensionary dues.

3. Facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Orderly in the year 1966 in the Fisheries Department and was posted under the Fisheries Inspector, Saharsa. After some time of his appointment, he started discharging duties of the next promotional post, i.e., to the post of Machhua. The Distri





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top