SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Pat) 258

NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Vidya Devi @ Vidya Raman – Appellant
Versus
Kishori Raman – Respondent


Judgment

1. The present revision application is by the wife, who was defendant in a Matrimonial suit for divorce. The Matrimonial Suit was decreed as against the defendant- petitioner. Against which First Appeal No. 652 of 1998 is pending before this court in owing parties have appeared.

2. While disposing of the Matrimonial Suit in terms of Section 25 of Hindu Marriage Act alimony and maintenance of minor children was provided for. Subsequently the defendant-petitioner filed I.A. No. 9448/ 99 in the said First Appeal, inter alia for enhancement of alimony in terms of Section 25 of Hindu Marriage Act.

3. The matter was contested and ultimately this Hon ble Court by order dated 1.10.1999 allowed the application and enhanced the alimony. Now, the defendant- petitioner wanted further enhancement in alimony. Instead of moving any application in the said First Appeal, as he had done earlier, he chose to move an application before the learned Matrimonial Court for enhancement of alimony as now fixed by this court in the said First Appeal. The impugned order is the rejection of defendant-petitioners said application by the matrimonial court. I am afraid no exception can be taken to the ord

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top