SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Pat) 250

MRIDULA MISHRA
Manju Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard the Counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Present writ application has been filed by the petitioners for quashing the first information report of Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 716 of 2005 corresponding to G. R. No. 3911 of 2005 registered under Secs. 307, 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Secs. 9, 9A, B, C, D, 13(l)(a), (b), (c), (d), 27A and 28B of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and 13(1) of the Drugs and Control Act, 1950. Further prayer of the petitioners is for direction to release the seized articles, such as manufactured medicines, etc. seized by the Officer-in-charge, Kadamkuan Police Station on 2.9.2005 from the factory premises of the petitioners.

3. On 1.9.2005 Officer-in-Charge of Kadamkuan Police Station in course of raid of some other factory premises manufacturing drugs, came to know about manufacturing of drugs at petitioners premises and when petitioner No. 2 was absent from his factory premises a raid was conducted by the officer-in-charge of Kadamkuan Police Station. In course of raid several articles and medicines were seized. On the next date along with the Drugs Inspectors again factory premises of the petitio




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top