SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Pat) 474

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Ram Kishore Singh And Braj Kishore Prasad Sandilya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Chandramauli Kr.Prasad, J.

1. In both the applications, common questions of law with little variation on facts arise and as such, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Prayer of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 26515 of 2005 is to quash the order dated 15.9.1998 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Aurangabad Mufassil P.S. Case No. 341 of 1995 (G.R.No. 1673 of 1995 whereby it had taken cognizance of the offence u/s. 406 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code and directed for issuance of process against the petitioner. In Cr. Misc. No. 32048 of 2005, prayer of the petitioner is to quash the first information report bearing Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 255 of 2004 registered under Sec. 406, 409, and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 .

3. Allegations against the petitioners in both the cases are that they had taken loan from the Bihar State Financial Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Corporation, hypothecated the articles and removed the hypothecated articles fraudulently without any information to the Corporation in breach of its terms and conditions.

4. Mr. Birju Prasad who appears on behalf of the petitioner in C


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top