SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Pat) 623

NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Ram Lochan Sharan – Appellant
Versus
Sri Balmukund Yadav – Respondent


Judgment

Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.

1. This is an application against an order by which the petitioners application to intervene and be added as a party to the suit has been rejected by the trial Court.

2. The plaintiffs had filed the suit for correction of revisional survey entry and consequently for declaration of their right, title and interest and possession in the property in question. The defendants were the State of Bihar and the Anchal Adhikari as well as the Gram Panchayat concerned. The intervener wants to intervene in the said suit on the grosdund that the land in question is a public pathway and he has a right to use the said land and he had been using that land since long. He had moved the State for removal of encroachment made by the plaintiffs. A proceeding for encroachment had been initiated and, accordingly, he was a necessary party in the suit. The plaintiffs have appeared before this Court. Heard the parties.

3. Having considered the rival submissions, it is apparent that the intervener-petitioner wants to assert his independent right of usage of the land aforesaid. Plaintiffs have no dispute with the intervener. It is well settled that the plaintiff is master of h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top