NAVANITI PD.SINGH, J.

1. This case shows the bizzare state of affairs prevailing at certain levels in the State and unfortunately caused by executive who though love to accept responsibility but hate to execute it responsibly.

2. The present writ application has been filed for quashing the detention of the Petitioner in civil prison pursuant to the warrant issued on 2nd August, 2006, by the Certificate Officer, Barh (Patna) in Certificate Case No. 2 of 2006-2007 instituted at the behest of the Punjab National Bank, Barh and for release of the Petitioner from civil prison to enable him to file his objection to the certificate proceedings which in law he is entitled to do.

3. Heard Shri Partha Sarthy, learned Counsel in support of the writ application and Shri Amanullah, learned SC17 appearing for the State. No one appears for Respondent No. 3-Punjab National Bank though the name of their Counsel Shri Sunil Kumar Singh No. 1 appear who has been served with a copy of the writ application.

4. The short point raised that certificate proceedings were initiated by the Punjab National Bank, Barh, against the Petitioner and was registered on 10th June, 2006. Notice was directed to b