1. All these three cases are taken up together as the parties in all these three cases are common and arise out of common transaction whereby the complainant-opposite party no. 2 had lent money to the accused company and its Managing Director.

2. Through Criminal Misc. No. 41948 of 2005, the petitioners have sought for quashing of the order dated 27.7.2005 passed in Complaint Case No. 2057(m) of 2005 whereunder the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, has taken cognizance of the offence under Sections 420/406/409 I.PC. and 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. Through Criminal Misc. No. 41952 of 2005, the petitioners have sought for quashing of the order dated 16.6.2005 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Complaint Case No. 1540(M) of 2005 wherein cognizance has been taken under similar offence and through Criminal Misc. No. 41953 of 2005 the petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 1.8.2005 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate in Complaint Case No. 2108(M) of 2005 whereby cognizance has been taken for similar offence.

3. The brief facts of all these three cases may be culled out from the records of Criminal Misc. No. 41948 o