SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Pat) 1242

SHEEMA ALI KHAN
Sri Ram Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners have filed this application stating therein that the case has been commited without giving him police record and papers as required under the law. As far as that part of the order is concerned, this Court finds that it is completely illegal and no commitment has taken place before giving the petitioners the copies of the diary, record or other documents as required under Sec. 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

3. Petitioners have also raised another point in which they have stated that the evidence of the witnesses before the police under Sec. 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was recorded on video camera as per the direction of the Director General of Police given in the supervision note. This video recording was not submitted in the court alongwith the charge-sheet. Petitioners have stated that they have also prayed in the court below that copies of the video recording should also be given to him alongwith the police papers.

4. I find that the court below has not recorded any order regarding the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. I, thus, direct that the court below should hear the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top