1. The challenge in this writ petition by invocation of Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner is against the order recorded by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench at Patna on 18.4.2005 in O.A. No. 112 of 2005, whereby the challenge against the transfer of the petitioner, who has been working as Officer in the Postal Service Grade-B, from Purnea to Patna, has been rejected.

2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties at the admission stage. We have considered the entire record and the text and tenor of the impugned order of the Tribunal. We have also taken into consideration the relevant pronouncement of law on jurisprudence of transfer.

3. The petitioner in his petition, inteialia, has contended that he joined the service of Postal Service Grade-B Officer and at the relevant time when he received transfer order he was posted at Purnea as Superintendent of Post Offices. He received an order of transfer from Purnea to Patna. There is no dispute about the fact that the petitioner is subjected to transfer any where in India, whereas, he has been transferred in the same State from Purnea to Patna. The Tribunal noticed