SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Pat) 40

PATNA HIGH COURT
Narayan Roy, J.
Most.Uttam Raj Kuer
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2480 of 1989 ;
Decided On : JANUARY 10, 2006

The order passed by the authorities under the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 would not affect the right, title, and interest of the parties unless a contrary decision is rendered by the competent civil court in any suit filed by either of the parties.

Headnote:

Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 - Writ Application - Effect of order passed by authorities under the Act on the right, title, and interest of the parties

Fact of the Case:

The writ application arose from an order passed by the authorities under the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956. The petitioners were not dispossessed, and the proceeding under the Act had been denotified.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the order passed by the authorities under the Act would not affect the right, title, and interest of the petitioners unless a contrary decision is rendered by the competent civil court in any suit filed by either of the parties.

Issues: Effect of order under the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 on the rights of the parties

Ratio Decidendi: The order passed by the authorities under the Act would not affect the right, title, and interest of the petitioners unless a contrary decision is rendered by the competent civil court in any suit filed by either of the parties.

Final Decision: The application is disposed of with the direction/observation that the order passed by the authorities under the Act would not affect the right, title, and interest of the petitioners unless a contrary decision is rendered by the competent civil court in any suit filed by either of the parties.

Judgment

Narayan Roy, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This writ application arises out of the order passed by the authorities under the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (hereinafter to be referred to as "Act")..

3. It does not appear to be a case that pursuant to the order passed by the authorities under the Act, the petitioners have been dispossessed or any right has been created in favour of respondent no. 5. The proceeding under the Act has already been denotified.

4. In that view of the matter, the order passed by the authorities under the Act would not affect the right, title and interest of the petitioners, unless a contrary decision is rendered by the competent civil court in any suit filed by either of the parties.

5. With the direction/observation aforesaid, this application is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top