SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Pat) 1260

BARIN GHOSH, M.SARAN
Ramashray Singh – Appellant
Versus
Balmiki Pd. Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Barin Ghosh, J.

1. A suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of an immovable property was decreed by the trial court. The appeal against such decree having been dismissed, the present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed.

2. The widow of Shyam Bihari Singh, Mostt. Mahtab Kuer, succeeded him as his sole heir and legal representative and accordingly, became owner of the properties left by Shyam Bihari Singh. The defendants in the suit were the heirs and legal representatives of the brother of Shyam Bihari Singh, late Banwari Singh. Mostt. Mahtab Kuer executed a deed of mortgage in October, 1973 and thereby mortgaged a part of her properties. On 3.11.1973 the subject agreement, specific performance whereof had been sought for, was executed by the Mostt. Mahtab Kuer agreeing to sell two bighas 9 kathas and 11 dhurs of land for a consideration of Rs. 20,000.00 in respect whereof a sum of Rs. 15,000.00 was paid to her and was accepted by her. The balance amount, of Rs. 5,000.00 was to be paid to her at, the time of execution of the sale deed in the first week of January, 2004. Neither the deed of mortgage, nor the agreement contained signature of Mostt. Mahtab Kuer.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top