1. By this Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent the challenge is made against the judgment of the learned Singie Judge recorded in CWJC No. 1624 of 2006 on 23.3.2006, whereby, the prayer for declaration of results of the theoretical examination held for the Sessions 1986-87 and of the practical examination held in the year, 1989 came to be rejected.

2. Though, it is a pitiable case for the students but the court is obliged to consider the legal proposition on the point. In a similar situation, one matter in the case of Arajkiya Khwaja Shahid Hussain Primary Teacher Training College V/s. The State of Bihar & Ors., 2005(4) PLJR 607, has been decided by the Hon ble Apex Court and the learned Single Judge has relied on the said decision and has, also, rightly dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, this Letters Patent Appeal.

3. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties and we have examined the factual matrix of this case. We have, also, considered and evaluated the text and tenor of the impugned order of the learned Single Judge. We are of the opinion that when the school is not recognized and