SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Pat) 412

PATNA HIGH COURT
Narayan Roy and J.N.Singh JJ.
Raj Kumar Saha
Versus
Ritu Kala Saran
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 323 of 2005 ;
Decided On : FEBRUARY 23, 2007

An appeal shall lie from every judgment or order of a Family Court to the High Court both on facts and on law, and a decree drawn in a suit can be tested in a First Appeal and not in a miscellaneous appeal.

Headnote:

Appeal - Family Courts Act, 1984 - The court held that an appeal shall lie from every judgment or order of a Family Court to the High Court both on facts and on law, and that a decree drawn in a suit can be tested in a First Appeal and not in a miscellaneous appeal.

Fact of the Case:

The appeal was filed against the order passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur in a matrimonial suit.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the Stamp Reporter to examine the questions and make a fresh stamp report after reviewing the judgments of the court on the point.

Issues: The main issue was the maintainability of the appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 to determine the maintainability of the appeal.

Final Decision: The court listed the matter for further hearing after two weeks as prayed for.

Judgment

1. This Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred against the order dated 14.7.2005 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur in Matrimonial Suit No. 84 of 2001.

1. According to the Stamp Reporter, this appeal has been made maintainable. Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 reads as under: "19 Appeal. (1) Save as provided in sub-sec. (2) and notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) of in any other law, an appeal shall lie from every judgment or order, not being an interlocutory order, of a Family Court to the High Court both on facts and on law.

(2) No appeal shall lie from a decree or order passed by the Family Court with the consent of the parties or from an order passed under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974): Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any appeal pending before a High Court or any order passed under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (2 of 1974) before the commencement of the Family Courts (Amendment) Act, 1991.

(3) Every appeal under this section shall be preferred within a period of thirty days from the date of judgment or order of a Family Court.

(4) The High Court may, of its own motion or otherwise, call for and examine the record of any proceeding in which the Family Court situate within its jurisdiction passed an order under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of the order, not being an interlocutory order, and, as to the regularity of such proceeding.

(5) Except as aforesaid, no appeal or revision shall lie to any court from any judgment, order or decree of a Family Court.

(6) An Appeal preferred under sub-sec. (1) shall be heard by a Bench consisting of two or more Judges."

2. According to Sec. 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 , it appears that an appeal shall lie from every judgment or order not being an interlocutory order of a Family Court to the High Court both on facts and on law. It further appears that the orders passed by Family Court is in the form of a decree. Obviously, therefore, a decree drawn in a suit can be tested by this court in a First Appeal and not in miscellaneous appeal.

3. The Stamp Reporter, in this view of the matter, is directed to examine these questions and make a fresh stamp report ing after going through the several judg-ments of this court on the point.

4. List this matter after two week as prayed for.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top